Search This Blog

Showing posts with label George Floyd. Show all posts
Showing posts with label George Floyd. Show all posts

Saturday, June 27, 2020

Large Numbers of the NYPD Leave Their Jobs After Calls For Defunding Get Louder


Defund the police? This is crazy.

Reform the police? Yes, absolutely. And give the NYPD MORE money for training that meets the ideals of the public in the areas of respect for all, equality, zero tolerance for bias, hate crimes, intentional harm, intimidation, or false claims. Open the records and hold anyone who violates these rules accountable with punishment equal to the crimes they commit, just like anyone else.

Defund the police? No, but make each officer accountable for his/her actions, and Do No Harm unless in danger of being killed with a lethal weapon. Keep all body cams on at all times, have the public give input on what happened. Give the public a voice, hear what people say, act on it.

We were walking our dog down second avenue about two weeks ago at 10:00pm when we saw two cars roll up to the Verizon Wireless store across the street. About 6-8 men rushed out of the cars, ran to the glass windows of the store, broke the glass, entered the store through the broken windows and grabbed all the telephones and other equipment on the walls and on the tables, and then jumped back into the waiting cars and took off. Police were called and there in 4 minutes, blocking off the sidewalk from pedestrians (and their pets) so no one got hurt.

We were glad that they came.

Defund the police? Who takes their place? Where will funding for the newbies come from?

This issue is so hot, our Mayor has no idea what to do:
De Blasio and lawmakers in budget stalemate over NYPD cuts, layoffs
Betsy Combier
betsy.combier@gmail.com
Editor, ADVOCATZ.com
Editor, ADVOCATZ Blog
Editor, NYC Rubber Room Reporter
Editor, Parentadvocates.org
Editor, New York Court Corruption
Editor, National Public Voice
Editor, NYC Public Voice
Editor, Inside 3020-a Teacher Trials 



272 uniformed NYPD cops file for retirement after George Floyd death
Dean Balsamini, NY POST, June 27, 2020

Cops are hanging up their handcuffs in huge numbers.
The flurry of Finest farewells began after the police-involved killing of George Floyd on May 25, with 272 uniformed cops putting in retirement papers from then through June 24, the NYPD says.
That’s a 49 percent spike from the 183 officers who filed during the same period last year, according to the department.
An NYPD source suggested the recent departures could signal a coming crisis for the 36,000-member department, which also faces a $1 billion budget reduction amid the “defund the police”  furor.
“We are worried about a surge in attrition reducing our headcount beyond what we can sustain without new recruits, and are afraid the City Council has not taken the surge into account,” he said.
Police Benevolent Association president Patrick Lynch said cops are “at their breaking point, whether they have 20 years on the job or only two. We are all asking the same question: ‘How can we keep doing our job in this environment?’ And that is exactly what the anti-cop crowd wants. If we have no cops because no one wants to be a cop, they will have achieved their ultimate goal.”

Ed Mullins, president of the Sergeants Benevolent Association, said an “exodus” from the NYPD has begun. He said nearly 80 of his members have recently filed for retirement, and that morale is “at the lowest levels I’ve seen in 38 years.”
The fiery union leader added, “People have had enough and no longer feel it’s worth risking their personal well-being for a thankless position.”
“There is no leadership, no direction, no training for new policies,” he said. “Department brass is paralyzed (and) too afraid to uphold their sworn oath in fear of losing their jobs. Sadly, the people of this city will soon experience what New York City was like in the 1980s.”
Outrage over Floyd’s death sparked nationwide protests, and some NYPD officers see themselves as collateral damage.
“It’s an all-out war on cops and we have no support,” said one veteran Brooklyn cop, who is retiring next month. “I wanted to wait for my 30th anniversary in October, but the handwriting is on the wall.”
Many men and women in blue are fed up, feeling targeted and frustrated that they are expected to fight crime with fewer tools than ever, while getting no backing from politicians, injured in protests, and constantly scrutinized, according to agitated officers and angry police unions.
The weary rank and file also wonder if one bad decision on the job could get them arrested and charged with a crime.

“If you have your time in and have an opportunity to do something else, get out while you can,” advised Joseph Giacalone, a retired NYPD sergeant and adjunct professor at the John Jay College of Criminal Justice in Manhattan.
Giacalone said he’d received three emails in “the past week or so” from students asking for advice about changing their career choice. Giacalone said he has not gotten “these kinds” of emails since the Michael Brown killing in Ferguson, Missouri, in August 2014.
He said he “never discourages anyone” about the job, he just “lays out the pros and cons” and also reminds students there are federal law enforcement jobs.
On Thursday, The Post exclusively reported that Bronx NYPD precinct commander Richard Brea is quitting to protest the department’s handling of police reform and anti-brutality protests. The Deputy Inspector, who led the Bronx’s 46th Precinct, will retire after nearly three decades on the force.

NYPD Sgt. Joseph Imperatrice, founder of Blue Lives Matter, which formed after NYPD officers Wenjian Liu and Rafael Ramos were assassinated in 2014, claims close to a dozen cops per day are putting in their papers. Imperatrice believes the number is “noticeably higher” than usual and due to the “anti-police and anti-criminal accountability” climate.
Imperatrice contends the number of cops leaving the job since the end of March is “approaching the 700 to 1,000 range between COVID and the anti-police narrative.”
“I feel sorry for the cops who just began their career and have 20 years to go,” Imperatrice said. “Morale across the nation for anybody who puts on that uniform is at an all-time low … Officers are showing up to work putting on their uniform and within a few days thereafter being put into handcuffs.”
He said one “fed-up” Manhattan detective, a 22-year-veteran with a wife and kids, is just waiting to hear back about a new job and then he’s putting in his papers and moving to Arizona. He believes the city is “going down the tubes quick and it’s not going to turn around anytime soon.”
Imperatrice said the heartbroken mom of an anti-crime unit cop killed in the line of duty recently contacted him, “beside herself” because the NYPD disbanded the unit and thus “disbanded the legacy of her son.”
“The politicians are spitting in the faces of families of cops killed in the line of duty and now they’re handing over the keys to the city to these criminals. This is insane,” Imperatrice fumed.
“Of course, if a police officer is acting criminal or abusing their authority, they should be held accountable. But the majority of incidents we are seeing do not warrant officers losing their job and being locked up.”
Said John Jay professor Giacalone: “We are living in the Twilight Zone — where the good guys are the bad guys and the bad guys are the good guys. No bail, no jail, selective prosecution — unless you’re a cop, then game on.
“People have lost their collective minds.”

Sunday, June 14, 2020

Drone Surveillance of Protests Raises Concerns For Free Speech Rights

A large fire burned in Minneapolis on May 28 in the wake of the killing of George 

Floyd while in police custody.

PHOTO: DAVID JOLES/STAR TRIBUNE/ASSOCIATED PRESS

A Predator B drone at Holloman Air Force Base in New Mexico last year.

PHOTO: HOLLANDSE-HOOGTE/ZUMA PRESS
The Wall Street Journal asks an important question:

Does high-tech surveillance interfere with the right to free speech?

If by "high-tech" surveillance we are talking about drones, I don't see it. If we are talking about wiretapping, then yes.

Betsy Combier, betsy.combier@gmail.com
Editor, ADVOCATZ.com
Editor, ADVOCATZ Blog
Editor, NYC Rubber Room Reporter
Editor, Parentadvocates.org
Editor, New York Court Corruption
Editor, National Public Voice
Editor, NYC Public Voice
Editor, Inside 3020-a Teacher Trials 




Democratic lawmakers and some conservatives call for a halt in 
monitoring peaceful demonstrations against police brutality

by John D. McKinnon and Michelle Hackman, Wall Street Journal, 6/10/2020

WASHINGTON—The government’s use of cutting-edge surveillance to monitor
protests is coming under scrutiny by lawmakers and activists, including conservatives
who see it as a threat to constitutional rights, amid a national rethinking of the role
of police.
The issue came to the fore after a Predator drone operated by U.S. Customs and
Border Protection was observed flying over protests in Minneapolis on May 29 in the 
wake of the killing of George Floyd in police custody there. Drone flights have also
also been reported over San Antonio and Detroit, according to a letter Tuesday from about
three dozen House members.

The letter, which called for a halt to surveillance of peaceful protests, also cites reports of 
surveillance flights by other agencies using conventional aircraft over Washington, D.C.
The letter, which called for a halt to surveillance of peaceful protests, also cites reports of surveillance flights by other agencies using conventional aircraft over Washington, D.C.
“Americans have a healthy fear of government surveillance that started at the founding of our country and has continued to modern times,” said the letter signed by lawmakers including Reps. Anna Eshoo (D., Calif.) and Bobby Rush (D., Ill.).

While the congressional scrutiny so far is coming from Democrats, some conservatives are troubled as well. “It’s disturbing to see tools built to gather military intelligence being used to watch U.S. citizens,” said Billy Easley II, a senior policy analyst at Americans for Prosperity, a conservative organization.

“Drones should not be used by the government to monitor or collect data on First Amendment activity,” he said. ”They should only be used when there is a threat to life or property, and the federal government should be transparent about the circumstances of their use.”

CBP confirmed that the agency flew a Predator over Minneapolis, but disputed the claim in the congressional letter that drones were flown over Detroit and San Antonio. The Minneapolis drone flight was first reported by the Project on Government Oversight, a nonpartisan research group.

CBP also used helicopters and planes to monitor protests, an agency spokesman said. He said the video captured is shared with local law enforcement to determine the size and movements of protests, and no attempt is made to identify individual protesters.

A second CBP official said the images provide “situational awareness.” He added: “If you’re law enforcement…it’d be helpful to know if it’s 20 people or 2,000 people.”

In their letter Tuesday, lawmakers also cited reports that other government agencies including the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Air National Guard are involved in protest surveillance.

In a statement, the FBI said it respects the rights of Americans to peacefully protest, and said its efforts “are focused on identifying, investigating and disrupting individuals that are inciting violence and engaging in criminal activity.”

The Air National Guard didn’t respond to a request for comment.

Federal officials including Attorney General William Barr have said their efforts during the protests have been focused on apprehending and charging what he called “violent radical agitators.” Mr. Barr has said violence by extremist groups during the protests amounts to domestic terrorism.

The surveillance has alarmed those who worry that federal, state and local agencies could be deploying an array of sophisticated tactics and techniques—including high-zoom surveillance cameras, facial-recognition software, cellphone monitoring devices and social-media tracking techniques—to monitor civilians engaged in peaceful demonstrations.

“No government agency should be facilitating the over-policing of the black community, period,” said ACLU senior legislative counsel Neema Singh Guliani in a statement. She added that the CBP’s “use of military technology to surveil protesters inside U.S. borders is deeply disturbing, especially given CBP’s lack of clear and strong policies to protect privacy and constitutional rights.”

While technology such as smartphones has helped document police violence, activists say it also can hamper protesters’ efforts to bring about change, by scaring some away.

The surveillance threatens to chill protesters’ First Amendment rights, said Saira Hussain, a staff attorney at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a digital-rights organization that has focused on high-tech surveillance.

“Why give law enforcement every single possible tool to use at its fingertips?” she said, adding: “I think this is a time of reckoning to figure out, do we want these tools to exist?”

Write to John D. McKinnon at john.mckinnon@wsj.com and Michelle Hackman at Michelle.Hackman@wsj.com